|
|
By Mason Gaffney, on January 31st, 2008%
Most economists today live in a two-factor world: There is just labor and capital. Land, so central to classical political economy, has been swallowed into capital and “disappeared.” This paper surveys some of the better historical treatments of land and capital, their interrelations, and how they support modern Georgists and Greens who want land to reappear. . . . → Read More: Keeping Land in Capital Theory: Ricardo, Faustmann, Wicksell, and George
By Mason Gaffney, on January 1st, 1987%
Nonpoint pollution goes right to a chink in the armor of conventionally trained economists (like myself) who are overtrained towards becoming protagonists of the price system. The very name “nonpoint” pollution suggests that economists see this as just an odd bit of clutter, something “non-regular” in their tidy world. Indeed, all pollution was an exception, an “externality”, until recently. Then economists . . . → Read More: Nonpoint Pollution: Tractable Solutions to Intractable Problems
By Mason Gaffney, on March 24th, 1980%
How should the forests be taxed? All agree they should be taxed on the basis of parity and equity with other industries and resources. But, with parity in respect to what? There is no substance to “parity” until we define the base. And unfortunately almost everyone, ourselves included, tends to define the base in the manner . . . → Read More: Alternative Ways of Taxing Forests
By Mason Gaffney, on March 4th, 1977%
Economists are not doing their job if they merely act like auditors and snoops. We are actually more dangerous than that. We become aware that there are gross perceptual biases in popular awareness of different kinds of waste. A poor congressman can get ruined for hiring a steno with a fast track record, but quietly waste billions of the . . . → Read More: Greater Social Benefits From our National Forests
By Mason Gaffney, on September 1st, 1957%
When should we cut a tree? Not only A) when the incremental value of growth no longer exceeds the cost of interest, but simultaneously B) when it’s time to free the land for a new crop–leading to a shorter cutting cycle than dictated by A) alone. . . . → Read More: Concepts of Financial Maturity of Timber and Other Assets
|
Recent Posts
- The Hidden Taxable Capacity of Land: Enough and to Spare
- Going My Way?
- Travelogue, St. Catharines to Albany, June 2012
- Reverberations between Immoderate Land-Price Cycles and Banking Cycles
- Sleeping with the Enemy: Economists who Side with Polluters
- How Religious Awakenings Presage Radical Reforms
- Al Rodda, RIP
- Review of Donald Stabile, The Living Wage
- Corporations, Democracy, and the US Supreme Court
- Interview on After the Crash, 2009
- The Four Vampires of Capital
- The Hidden Taxable Capacity of Land: Enough and to Spare
- Empty Spaces: How Our Tax Policies Caused the Present Seizure by Unbalancing Hard and Soft Capital
- How to Thaw Credit, Now and Forever
- Is the Bailout Justified?
- THE GREAT CRASH OF 2008
- Stimulus: the False and the True
- Keeping Land in Capital Theory: Ricardo, Faustmann, Wicksell, and George
- The Shrinking Dollar
- Neo-classical Economics as a Stratagem Against Henry George
- A Severance Tax on California Oil?
- Repopulating New Orleans
- New Life in Old Cities
- Denying Inflation: Who, Why, and How?
- What Is “Consumption”?
|